What’s the downside of Extra or Innovative benefits for the Plan F Medigap Insurance Policy?
UPDATE: This information was written prior to CA passing a law (SB407) that restricts insurance companies from differentiating Plan F from Innovative or Extra Plan F. Please disregard the information below that discusses that as that law went into effect in July of 2020.
I wanted to talk to you about something that is super important in the Medicare supplement, also known as Medigap industry. It’s happening right now in 2019. It actually started in 2018 but I’ve been doing some research because I really had kind of a gut feeling about what’s been happening and I think I’m right. So, let me back up a little and tell you what’s going on.
There have been several companies who have created their own Plan F versions.
These extra or innovative plans include all the benefits of Plan F plus extra benefits. Many companies have riders for dental, vision, or hearing, and that is not what we are talking about here. We are discussing plans that have their own names and benefits that are embedded in the plan. These extra benefits can include things like vision and hearing benefits or maybe personal safety device benefits. And these sound really great on the surface. I mean it’s like, wow, I can get these extra benefits that I can’t get in another plan…
Here’s the issue:
Number one, Medigap plans were designed to be standardized. These insurance companies that are coming up with their own Medicare supplement plan, they’re making it hard to do comparisons. And that is one reason we like Medigap plans is because they’re easy to compare.
With all of these new benefits that some insurance companies are adding to Plan F, it makes it more difficult to compare.
SB 407: California wants to restrict Innovative Plan F and Plan F Extra
THIS LAW PASSED AND WENT EFFECT ON 07/01/2020
There is a California Bill called SB 407, which would restrict insurance companies from offering these plans (in California).
It would still allow insurance companies to offer these extra benefits but as a rider. In other words, the extra benefits could not be embedded in the plan itself. So as far as I know, they could make that rider free if they wanted to or they could charge a small amount for it. So, I urge you to look at the bill that is being passed around and contact your congressperson to voice your opinion on these insurance companies offering these extra plan benefits to Plan F. It sounds great now, but I’m just a little concerned about what will happen in the future. Is it going to restrict you from being able to make the changes that the state of California promised you? I don’t know of a national law at this time, but I do know of the California bill.
One criticism of the bill is that it might restrict companies from offering gym memberships as part of their plans. However, gym memberships are usually not embedded in the benefit. For example, one major company recently removed Silver Sneakers from its Plan F. It was allowed to do so because the gym membership is not part of the plan itself.
Karen Fletcher of the CA Health Advocates wrote an article regarding these plans and the CA bill (SB 407). You can read her article HERE